TypesensevsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Typesense | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 41 in Search Engines | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 27 064 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 18 |
| Latest release | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).
Typesense details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep Typesense, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with