tunesynctoolvswger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| tunesynctool | wger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 7 203 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +240 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
wger scores 73/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
wger ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.
If you want the quickest setup, wger is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
wger is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).
tunesynctool details →wger details →
Swap a project
Keep tunesynctool, compare it with
Keep wger, compare it with