tunesynctoolvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| tunesynctool | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 17 187 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
tunesynctool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).
tunesynctool details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep tunesynctool, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with