Tube ArchivistvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
Tube Archivist details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with