MediaMTXvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with