Tube Archivistvsxpipe-webtop
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | xpipe-webtop | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #5 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 14 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 36 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | 24.10 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 70/100 for xpipe-webtop, so it is the safer default.
xpipe-webtop ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, xpipe-webtop is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist details →xpipe-webtop details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep xpipe-webtop, compare it with