Tube Archivistvsworklenz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | worklenz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 | 3 285 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 63/100 for worklenz, so it is the safer default.
worklenz ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, worklenz is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist details →worklenz details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep worklenz, compare it with