livekitvsworklenz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | worklenz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 21 913 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +814 | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 63/100 for worklenz, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for worklenz.
If you want the quickest setup, worklenz is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+814 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →worklenz details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep worklenz, compare it with