Tube Archivistvsvod2pod-rss
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | vod2pod-rss | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #6 of 18 in Podcasts |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 389 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 49/100 for vod2pod-rss, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for vod2pod-rss.
If you want the quickest setup, vod2pod-rss is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →vod2pod-rss details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep vod2pod-rss, compare it with