Tube ArchivistvsVigil365
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Vigil365 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 8 553 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C# |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →Vigil365 details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Vigil365, compare it with