trip2gvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trip2g | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 40 | 6 523 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.
trip2g ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, trip2g is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
trip2g details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep trip2g, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with