trip2gvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trip2g | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 40 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 29 |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.
verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
trip2g details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep trip2g, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with