trip2gvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trip2g | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 40 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.
If you want the quickest setup, trip2g is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
trip2g details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep trip2g, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with