trip2gvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trip2g | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 40 | 17 188 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.
trip2g ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
trip2g details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep trip2g, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with