trip2gvsTypesense
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trip2g | Typesense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 40 | 27 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +470 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.
trip2g ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+470 stars in 30 days).
trip2g details →Typesense details →
Swap a project
Keep trip2g, compare it with
Keep Typesense, compare it with