TrinityvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Trinity | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #60 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 713 | 89 759 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +2 420 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 420 stars in 30 days).
Trinity details →World Monitor details →