TrinityvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Trinity | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #60 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 712 | 53 720 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +325 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).
Trinity details →WindowsinDocker details →