TrinityvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Trinity | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #60 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 712 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Trinity details →Tube Archivist details →