Trilium NotesvsTypecho
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Trilium Notes | Typecho | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 38 609 | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +634 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.
If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Trilium Notes needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+634 stars in 30 days).
Trilium Notes details →Typecho details →
Swap a project
Keep Trilium Notes, compare it with
Keep Typecho, compare it with