triggervsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 16 647 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +260 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 9 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
trigger is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with