triggervs心潮动态心智系统
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | 心潮动态心智系统 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 16 648 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +249 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 1 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for 心潮动态心智系统.
If you want the quickest setup, 心潮动态心智系统 is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+249 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →心潮动态心智系统 details →