triggervsWPMgr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | WPMgr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #15 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 647 | 165 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +260 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 9 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.61.198 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 48/100 for WPMgr, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for WPMgr.
If you want the quickest setup, WPMgr is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →WPMgr details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep WPMgr, compare it with