triggervsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 16 644 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
trigger is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with