triggervsWiki.js
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | Wiki.js | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 31 in Wikis |
| GitHub stars | 16 645 | 29 101 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +258 | +144 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 7 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.5.315 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Wiki.js scores 77/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Wiki.js.
If you want the quickest setup, Wiki.js is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger details →Wiki.js details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep Wiki.js, compare it with