triggervsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 16 645 | 4 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +258 | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 3 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, WhisperLive---CPU is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+258 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with