triggervswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 644 | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for wanderer.
If you want the quickest setup, wanderer is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger details →wanderer details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep wanderer, compare it with