triggervsWakupator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | Wakupator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 16 647 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +260 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 1 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.
trigger is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →Wakupator details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep Wakupator, compare it with