triggervsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 16 645 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +258 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
trigger is growing faster right now (+258 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with