triggervsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 16 644 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 49 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep trigger, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with