triggervsUniFi Docker Container
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| trigger | UniFi Docker Container | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #15 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 650 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +251 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 51 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.8.2 · 29 Oct 2026 | 10.6.106 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 53/100 for UniFi Docker Container, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 51 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for UniFi Docker Container.
If you want the quickest setup, UniFi Docker Container is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+251 stars in 30 days).
trigger details →UniFi Docker Container details →