TrenovavsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Trenova | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 314 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.
Trenova ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Trenova details →Tube Archivist details →