transfer.shvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| transfer.sh | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 86 in File Sharing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 15 908 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
transfer.sh scores 69/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
transfer.sh is growing faster right now (+11 stars in 30 days).
transfer.sh details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with