transfer.shvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| transfer.sh | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 15 908 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
transfer.sh scores 69/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
transfer.sh is growing faster right now (+11 stars in 30 days).
transfer.sh details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with