transcribervsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| transcriber | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 154 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.
If you want the quickest setup, transcriber is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
transcriber details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep transcriber, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with