tootikvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| tootik | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #53 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 211 | 89 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 423 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.25.5 · 3 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 47/100 for tootik, so it is the safer default.
tootik ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, tootik is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 423 stars in 30 days).
tootik details →World Monitor details →