tobabvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| tobab | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #34 of 40 in Authentication | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 155 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; tobab needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
tobab details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep tobab, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with