timeoff-management-applicationvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| timeoff-management-application | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Human Resource Management (HRM) | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 047 | 93 041 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +1 294 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 57/100 for timeoff-management-application, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for timeoff-management-application.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; timeoff-management-application needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 294 stars in 30 days).
timeoff-management-application details →uptime-kuma details →