Tile38vszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tile38 | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Geospatial | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 750 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.38.0 · 9 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 66/100 for Tile38, so it is the safer default.
Tile38 ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, Tile38 is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
Tile38 details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Tile38, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with