Tile38vsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tile38 | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Geospatial | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 9 749 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.38.0 · 9 Jun 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Tile38 scores 66/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Tile38.
If you want the quickest setup, Tile38 is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Tile38 is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
Tile38 details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Tile38, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with