tg-spamvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| tg-spam | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Anti-Spam | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 453 | 118 043 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 684 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.29.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 52/100 for tg-spam, so it is the safer default.
tg-spam ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, tg-spam is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 684 stars in 30 days).
tg-spam details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep tg-spam, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with