docker-mailservervsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-mailserver | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Mail Server | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 19 700 | 117 848 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +827 | +5 489 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v16.0.1 · 4 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 80/100 for docker-mailserver, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for docker-mailserver.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; docker-mailserver needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).
docker-mailserver details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-mailserver, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with