textsnapvsUnison
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| textsnap | Unison | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 12 in Document Processing | #2 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 196 | 5 560 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
Unison scores 65/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; Unison needs more configuration.
Unison is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
textsnap details →Unison details →
Swap a project
Keep textsnap, compare it with
Keep Unison, compare it with