Text Generation WebUIvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Text Generation WebUI | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 47 724 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
Text Generation WebUI details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with