Text Generation WebUIvsUmlautAdaptarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Text Generation WebUI | UmlautAdaptarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 728 | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 3 |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for UmlautAdaptarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; UmlautAdaptarr needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
Text Generation WebUI details →UmlautAdaptarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with
Keep UmlautAdaptarr, compare it with