teslamateapivsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| teslamateapi | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 257 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.25.0 · 7 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 46/100 for teslamateapi, so it is the safer default.
teslamateapi ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; teslamateapi needs more configuration.
teslamateapi details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep teslamateapi, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with