temporalvszusam
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | zusam | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #58 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 24 064 | 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +786 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | 0.6.1 · 2 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 44/100 for zusam, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for zusam.
If you want the quickest setup, zusam is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+786 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →zusam details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep zusam, compare it with