temporalvsZeroNet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | ZeroNet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #1 of 3 in Peer-to-Peer |
| GitHub stars | 24 052 | 18 786 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +774 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 63/100 for ZeroNet, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ZeroNet.
If you want the quickest setup, ZeroNet is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+774 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →ZeroNet details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep ZeroNet, compare it with