temporalvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 24 053 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +775 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+775 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with