temporalvsworklenz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | worklenz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 065 | 3 285 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +787 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 63/100 for worklenz, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for worklenz.
If you want the quickest setup, worklenz is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+787 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →worklenz details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep worklenz, compare it with