temporalvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 052 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +774 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Winter CMS is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+774 stars in 30 days).
temporal details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with